-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support GeoJSON uploads for creating opportunity datasets. #902
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
f71b880
to
ab7d1b6
Compare
ab7d1b6
to
162f29b
Compare
1b8ead8
to
c39100e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on a discussion last year, we might want to follow the approach in #761. If we're not going to switch to that workflow yet, it might be good at this stage to reduce some of the repetition here, by refactoring some of the fromShapefile
code into reusable methods.
3db9bf7
to
9d9081f
Compare
This doesn't prevent or hinder following the approach in #761 whenever that is implemented.
Ok, I'll take a look and see if there is something to pull out there 👍 |
9d9081f
to
cfe9fd3
Compare
Closely mirrors the way Shapefiles are converted into grids. With GeoTools it is quite simple. It's possible to abstract common creation code between the two types but may not be necessary unless more types are added.
Co-authored-by: Anson Stewart <[email protected]>
cfe9fd3
to
4c8a8fd
Compare
Closely mirrors the way Shapefiles are converted into grids.
Refs #747